Monthly Archives: March 2022

Adrienne Rich: Why I Refused the National Medal for The Arts

[This is the letter poet and essayist Adrienne Rich sent  on July 3, 1997, to then director of the National Endowment for the Arts, actor Jane Alexander. In it, Ms. Rich explains why her conscience forbids her to accept the National Medal for the Arts that year. Incidentally, this wasn’t the first time Adrienne Rich took a principled stand in refusing an award.]

“Dear Jane Alexander,

I just spoke with a young man from your office, who informed me that I had been chosen to be one of twelve recipients of the National Medal for the Arts at a ceremony at the White House in the fall. I told him at once that I could not accept such an award from President Clinton or this White House because the very meaning of art, as I understand it, is incompatible with the cynical politics of this administration. I want to clarify to you what I meant by my refusal.

Anyone familiar with my work from the early sixties on knows that I believe in art’s social presence–as a breaker of official silences, as a voice for those whose voices are disregarded, and as a human birthright. In my lifetime I have seen the space for the arts opened by movements for social justice, the power of art to break despair. Over the past two decades I have witnessed the increasingly brutal impact of racial and economic injustice in our country.

There is no simple formula for the relationship of art to justice. But I do know that art–in my own case the art of poetry–means nothing if it simply decorates the dinner table of power that holds it hostage. The radical disparities of wealth and power in America are widening at a devastating rate. A president cannot meaningfully honor certain token artists while the people at large are so dishonored.

I know you have been engaged in a serious and disheartening struggle to save government funding for the arts, against those whose fear and suspicion of art is nakedly repressive. In the end, I don’t think we can separate art from overall human dignity and hope. My concern for my country is inextricable from my concerns as an artist. I could not participate in a ritual that would feel so hypocritical to me.

Sincerely.

Adrienne Rich

cc: President Clinton”

Excerpted from: Hunter, J, Paul, Alison Booth, and Kelly J. Mays. The Norton Introduction to Poetry, Ninth Edition. New York: Norton, 2007.

Cultural Literacy: Betty Friedan

Here is a Cultural Literacy worksheet on Betty Friedan. This is a half-page worksheet with a reading of three sentences and three comprehension questions. In other words, a basic introduction to this seminal figure in the modern feminist movement.

If you find typos in this document, I would appreciate a notification. And, as always, if you find this material useful in your practice, I would be grateful to hear what you think of it. I seek your peer review.

Adrienne Rich on the Needs of Art

“Art can never be totally legislated to any system, even those that reward obedience and send dissidents to hard labor and death; not can it, in our specifically compromised system, be really free. It may push up through cracked macadam, by the merest means, but it needs breathing space, cultivation, protection to fulfill itself, Just as people do. New artists, young or old, need education in their art, the tools of their craft, chances to study examples from the past and meet practitioners in the present, get the criticism and encouragement of mentors, learn that they are not alone. As the social compact withers, fewer and fewer people will be told Yes, you can do this; this also belongs to you. Like government, art needs the participation of the many in order not to become the property of a powerful and narrowly self-interested few.”

Excerpted from: Hunter, J, Paul, Alison Booth, and Kelly J. Mays. The Norton Introduction to Poetry, Ninth Edition. New York: Norton, 2007.

The Weekly Text, 4 March 2022, Women’s History Month 2022 Week I: A Reading and Comprehension Worksheet on Margaret Sanger

March is Women’s History Month. Mark’s Text Terminal observes the occasion with documents posts and quotes dealing with women’s myriad contributions to the world. To begin the month, here is a reading on Margaret Sanger and a vocabulary-building and comprehension worksheet to accompany it.

Incidentally, I am well aware that Margaret Sanger is a controversial figure–and so is the organization she founded, Planned Parenthood, which issued this manifesto on Ms. Sanger, addressing her involvement with the eugenics movement in the United State and analyzing whether or not she was racist. This is an extremely complicated topic; if you type “Margaret Sanger and eugenics” you will receive page after page of results, many of them highly ideologically charged.

What Margaret Sanger did accomplish, to the offense of many, was to make contraception available to couples who could then, literally, plan their parenthood. Contraception is a sin in the Catholic church, though many Protestants also take umbrage at the idea that a woman has the right to control her own body. Planned Parenthood at this point in its history has established a history of providing healthcare (and yes, the occasional abortion, still legal for now) to low-income patients. For these reasons, Planned Parenthood has become a target of choice for the anti-feminist right wing of the Republican party. Margaret Sanger’s poor choice of ideological fellow travelers has made her a tool of activists who seek to destroy Planned Parenthood.

If you find typos in these documents, I would appreciate a notification. And, as always, if you find this material useful in your practice, I would be grateful to hear what you think of it. I seek your peer review.