Category Archives: Reference

These are materials for teachers and parents, and you’ll find, in this category, teachers copies and answer keys for worksheets, quotes related to domain-specific knowledge in English Language Arts and social studies, and quotes on issues of professional concern. See the Taxonomies page for more about this category.

Teaching and Learning Support: Enclose Parenthetic Expressions Between Commas

[If you would like this learning support as a Word document, just click on that hyperlink.]

“Enclose parenthetic expressions between commas.

The best way to see a country, unless you are pressed for time, is to travel on foot.

This rule is difficult to apply; it is frequently hard to decide whether a single word, such as however, or a brief phrase is or is not parenthetic. If the interruption to the flow of the sentence is but slight, the commas may be safely omitted. But whether the interruption is slight or considerable, never omit one comma and leave the other. There is no defense of such punctuation as

Marjorie’s husband, Colonel Nelson paid us a visit yesterday.

or

My brother, you will be pleased to hear, is now in perfect health,

Dates usually contain parenthetic words of figures. Punctuation is as follows:

February to July, 1992

April 6, 1986

Wednesday, November 14, 1990

Note that it is customary to omit the comma in

6 April 1988

The last form is an excellent way to write a date; the figures are separated by a word and are, for that reason, quickly grasped.

A name of title in direct address in parenthetic.

If, Sir, you refuse, I cannot predict what will happen.

Well, Susan, this is a fine mess your are in.

The abbreviations etc., i.e., and e.g., the abbreviations of academic degrees, and titles that follow a name are parenthetic and should be punctuated accordingly.

Letters, packages, etc., should go here.

Horace Fulsome, Ph.D., presided.

Rachel Simonds, Attorney

The Reverend Harry Lang, S.J.

No comma, however, should separate a noun from a restrictive term of identification.

Billy the Kid

The novelist Jane Austen

William the Conquerer

The poet Sappho

Although Junior, with its abbreviation Jr., has commonly been regarded as parenthetic, logic suggests that it is, in fact, restrictive and therefore not in need of a comma.

James Wright Jr.

Nonrestrictive relative clauses are parenthetic, as are similar clauses introduced by conjunctions indicating time or place. Commas are therefore needed. A nonrestrictive clause is one that does not serve to identify or define the antecedent noun.

The audience, which had at first been indifferent, became more and more interested.

In 1769, when Napoleon was born, Corsica had but recently been acquired by France.

Nether Stowey, where Coleridge wrote The Rime of the Ancient Mariner, is a few miles from Bridgewater.

In these sentences, the clauses introduced by which, when, and where are nonrestrictive; they do not limit or define, they merely add something. In the first example, the clause introduced by which does not serve to tell which of several possible audiences is meant; the reader presumably knows that already. The clause adds, parenthetically, a statement supplementing that in the main clause. Each of the three sentences is a combination of two statements that might have been made independently.

The audience was at first indifferent. Later it became more and more interested.

Napoleon was born in 1769. At that time Corsica had but recently been acquired by France.

Coleridge wrote The Rime of the Ancient Mariner at Nether Stowey. Nether Stowey is a few miles from Bridgewater.

Restrictive clauses, by contrast, are not parenthetic and are not set off by commas. Thus,

People who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones.

Here the clause introduced by who does serve to tell which people are meant; the sentence, unlike the sentence above, cannot be split into two independent statements. The same principle of comma use applies to participial phrased and to appositives.

People sitting in the rear couldn’t hear. (restrictive)

Uncle Burt, being slightly deaf, moved forward, (non-restrictive)

My cousin Bob is a talented harpist. (restrictive).

Our oldest daughter, Mary, sings. (non-restrictive)

When a the main clause of a sentence is preceded by a phrase or a subordinate clause, us a comma to set off these elements.

Partly by hard fighting, partly by diplomatic skill, they enlarged their dominions to the east and rose to royal rank with the possession of Sicily.”

Excerpted from: Strunk, William Jr., and E.B. White. The Elements of Style, Fourth Edition. New York: Longman, 2000.

Book of Answers: The Size of a Book

“What is the difference between a folio and a quarto? An octavo and a duodecimo? All of these terms refer to book sizes. In the first centuries of printing, book pages were of a standard size—13½  inches by 17 inches. These ‘foolscap’ sheets, when folded one or more times, produced a ‘signature,’ a section that was bound with other signatures to produce the book. A folio was a signature of two leaves, a quarto four leaves, an octavo eight leaves, and a duodecimo twelve leaves.”

Excerpted from: Corey, Melinda, and George Ochoa. Literature: The New York Public Library Book of Answers. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1993.

3 Gorgons

“Stheno * Euryale * Medusa

“Stheno (the mighty), Euryale (the far-springer) and Medusa (the queen) were, again, ancient aspects of the triple goddess in her destructive, vengeful form, though they were later demoted in scale to malevolent creatures. Perseus’s murder of Medusa can be read as a mythic explanation of the toppling of the old female-ruled universe by a new breed of priest-warriors. However, the power of the old beliefs doesn’t wane easily: Medusa’s blood turned into serpents when it penetrated the ground, and gave birth to the winged horse Pegasus when it met the sea.”

Excerpted from: Rogerson, Barnaby. Rogerson’s Book of Numbers: The Culture of Numbers–from 1,001 Nights to the Seven Wonders of the World. New York: Picador, 2013.

Write It Right: Afford

“Afford. It is not well to say ‘the fact affords a reasonable presumption’; ‘the house afforded ample accommodation.’ The fact supplies a reasonable presumption. The house offered, or gave, ample accommodation.”

Excerpted from: Bierce, Ambrose. Write it Right: A Little Blacklist of Literary Faults. Mineola, NY: Dover, 2010.

Term of Art: Rhetorical Question

“Rhetorical Question: A question that expects no answer. The answer may be self-evident (If she doesn’t like me why should I care what she thinks?) or immediately provided by the questioner (What should be done? Well, first we should…). The question is often asked for dramatic effect. Rhetorical questions are sometimes announced with such a phrase as I ask you (when nothing is in fact being asked): ‘Garn! I ask you, what kind of a word is that? / It’s Ow and Garn that keep her in her place / Not her wretched clothes and dirty face’ (Alan Jay Lerner, My Fair Lady, 1956).”

Excerpted from: McArthur, Tom. The Oxford Concise Companion to the English Language. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.

Common Errors in English Usage: Complementary and Complimentary

Here’s an English usage worksheets on the adjectives and homophones complementary and complimentary if you need your students to know, understand, and differentiate these two words.

If you find typos in this document, I would appreciate a notification. And, as always, if you find this material useful in your practice, I would be grateful to hear what you think of it. I seek your peer review.

Rotten Reviews: All the King’s Men by Robert Penn Warren

“Somewhere, Mr. Warren loses his grip on his backwoods opportunities and becomes so absorbed in a number of other characters that what might have been a useful study of an irresponsible politician whose prototype whe have had melancholy occasion to observe in the flesh turns out to be a disappointment.”

The New Yorker

“The language of both men and women is coarse, blasphemous, and revolting—their actions would shame a pagan hottentot.”

Catholic World

Excerpted from: Barnard, Andre, and Bill Henderson, eds. Pushcart’s Complete Rotten Reviews and Rejections. Wainscott, NY: Pushcart Press, 1998.

Term of Art: Pastiche

“Pastiche (noun): A literary work that draws on styles, formats, etch., of other sources and thus is eclectic and derivative, and often whimsical or irreverent (but not with humor as a primary intent); book or story made up of borrowings from other writers; hodgepodge; stylistic imitation of a writer at work; parody. Noun: pasticheur.

‘His novels were pastiches of work of the best people of his time, a feat not to be disparaged, and in addition he possessed a gift for softening and debasing what he borrowed, so that many readers were charmed by the ease with which they could follow him.’

F. Scott Fitzgerald, Tender is the Night”

Excerpted from: Grambs, David. The Random House Dictionary for Writers and Readers. New York: Random House, 1990.

Memo to Groucho Viz Television from Goodman Ace

“[Of television) “We call it a medium because nothing’s well done.”

Goodman Ace, in a letter to Groucho Marx

Excerpted from: Schapiro, Fred, ed. The Yale Book of Quotations. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2006.

Daniel Willingham on Circularity and Hermeneutics

“Most of us have this experience at one time or another. You consult a dictionary to get a word definition, perhaps ‘condescending.’ The dictionary defines it as ‘patronizing,’ which is no help because you don’t know the meaning of that word, either. So you look up ‘patronizing’ and find that it is defined as ‘condescending.’

That’s an example of a circular definition, and it’s kind of funny, especially when it happens to someone else. But wait a minute…. Words seem defined by their features (watermelon is the red-on-the-inside, juicy, sweet, fruit), but how are the features defined? By other words. So doesn’t the model amount to a bunch of circular definitions, even if the circles may be bigger than the condescending-patronizing loop.

The way out of this problem is to consider the possibility that some representations are grounded. That means that some mental concepts derive meaning not from other mental concepts, but more directly from experience. For example, perhaps the definition of red is not rooted in language. Indeed, if you look up ‘red’ in the dictionary, the definition is pretty unsatisfying. Perhaps the mental definition of red should be rooted in the visual system; when you see the word ‘red,’ its referent is a memory of what it’s like to actually see red.

In the last twenty years, much evidence has accumulated that some representations are grounded—they are defined, at least in part, by our senses or by how we move. For example, when you read the word ‘kick,’ the part of your brain that controls leg movements shows activity, even though you’re not moving your leg. And the part of your brain that controls mouth movements is active when you read the word ‘lick,’ and that which controls finger movements is active when you read ‘pick,’ Part of the mental definition of kick, lick, and pick is what it feels like to execute those movements.

Excerpted from: Willingham, Daniel T. The Reading Mind: A Cognitive Approach to Understanding How the Mind Reads. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2017.