Category Archives: Quotes

As every second post on this site is a quote. You’ll find a deep and broad variety of quotes under this category, which overlap with several other tags and categories. Many of the quotes are larded with links for deeper reading on the subject of the quote, or connections between the subject of the quotes and other people, things, or ideas. See the Taxonomies page for more about this category.

Troubadours

“Troubadours: Poets of southern France, northern Italy, and Catalunya who flourished from the 12th to the 13th century and wrote primarily in Occitan. The term is derived from the Occitan verb trobar, to compose. Troubadour poetry is best known through the elaborately formal lyrical Canso which celebrated courtly love and chivalry, and for proposing a fusion of aesthetic sensibility with the ability to love. During the 13th century nonlyrical genres, such as the sirventes, and the narrative works, such as the Canso de la crozada, became prevalent. Eleanor of Aquitaine was a noted patron of troubadours who introduced troubadour themes and lyrical conventions at the courts of northern France. The trobairitz were female poets of southern France who wrote in Occitan in the same period. Most trobairitz, such as Beatrice de Dia, Cara d’Andeza, and Na Castelloza practiced the Canso and other lyric genres. (See TROUVERES; GUILLAUME IX; BERNARD DE VENTADOR; and BETRAN DE BORN.)”

Excerpted from: Murphy, Bruce, ed. Benet’s Reader’s Encyclopedia, Fourth Edition. New York: Harper Collins, 1996.

Term of Art: Prepositive

“Prepositive: Placed before another word or words, or prefixed, e.g., ‘most foul murder.’”

Excerpted from: Grambs, David. The Random House Dictionary for Writers and Readers. New York: Random House, 1990.

Rotten Reviews: The Prelude (William Wordsworth)

“Rotten Reviews: The Prelude (William Wordsworth)

‘The story is the old story. There are the old raptures about mountains and cataracts. The old flimsy philosophy about the effect of scenery on the mind; the old crazy mystical metaphysics; the endless wilderness of dull, flat, prosaic twaddle…,”

 T.B. Macaulay, in his journal

Excerpted from: Barnard, Andre, and Bill Henderson, eds. Pushcart’s Complete Rotten Reviews and Rejections. Wainscott, NY: Pushcart Press, 1998. 

Term of Art: Strong Verb

“Strong Verb: A term in the description of Germanic languages for a verb that indicates such differences as tense by modifying its vowels: English ring, rang, rung. In contrast, weak verbs add inflections: play, played, played. These terms are usually replaced in grammars of modern English by regular verb (in place of weak verb) and irregular verb (in place of strong verb). In Old English, strong verbs could have as many as four different vowels, since the first- and third-person singular in the past differed from all the other past forms: compare was and were in the Modern English past of the verb be. An example from Old English is the verb helpan, with e in the present tense, but past healp (first- and third-person singular) and hulpon, and the past participle holpen (with the -en inflection found in some Modern English irregular verbs: shaken, taken). In Modern English, this verb has become weak (help, helped), a change that his affected many other strong verbs over the centuries, such as climb, step, walk. The strong verbs that have survived into Modern English seldom retain the original distinctions, and all (except the highly irregular be, with was and were) have lost the two forms for the past. In some Modern English verbs, the vowels or the past and the past participle have become identical (sting, stung), and in others all three forms are the same (put). Some originally strong verbs have regular variants (swell, swelled, or swollen). A few originally weak verbs have become strong, such as wear, dig, fling. Differences may occur between varieties: (1) dive, dived in British English, but often dive, dove in American English; (2) sell, sold and tell, told in standard English worldwide, but sell, sellt, tell, tellt in Scots. Occasionally, for facetious purposes, people play with strong forms: I thunk very hard about it and Where were you brung up? In general, new verbs in Modern English are regular; that is, formed on the pattern of weak verbs, the pronunciation of the -ed inflection as /(e)d/ or /t/ varying systematically according to the immediately preceding sound. Verbs formed by prefixation or compounding usually take the same forms as the verbs on which they are based: offset, babysit, and (both regular and irregular) deepfreeze. Some phrasal verbs prefer a weak form (contrast The card sped up the hill and The car speeded up).”

Excerpted from: McArthur, Tom. The Oxford Concise Companion to the English Language. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.

Term of Art: Partitive

Partitive: Indicating restricting, setting off, or only a part of, e.g. ‘a scrap of food,’ ‘one of your friends.’”

Excerpted from: Grambs, David. The Random House Dictionary for Writers and Readers. New York: Random House, 1990.

Term of Art: Cloze Reading

“cloze reading: A test or exercises of reading comprehension in which the student must supply words that have been purposely removed from the sample piece of writing.”

Excerpted from: Ravitch, Diane. EdSpeak: A Glossary of Education Terms, Phrases, Buzzwords, and Jargon. Alexandria, VA: ASCD, 2007.

Term of Art: Nominative

“Nominative: Indicating the subject of a verb (or predicate after a copulative verb), or direct address, e.g., ‘She eats too much, ‘He is my uncle.’”

Excerpted from: Grambs, David. The Random House Dictionary for Writers and Readers. New York: Random House, 1990.

Still Life

“Still Life: (Fr. nature morte) A painting, drawing, or mosaic of a group of inanimate objects, i.e. dead or at least motionless objects, such as fruit, flowers, dead fish or game, and common household objects. Still lifes were typical of Greek and Roman mosaics, but they did not remerge until the 16th century, when they became popular subjects especially in Dutch, Flemish, Spanish, and Neapolitan painting. See VANITAS.”

Excerpted from: Diamond, David G. The Bulfinch Pocket Dictionary of Art Terms. Boston: Little Brown, 1992.

Chapter 3 of The Reading Mind, “Reading at a Glance”: Summary, Implications and Discussion Questions

“Summary

  • Experienced readers have distinct representations for three aspects of each word: the sound, the spelling, and the meaning. These representations are distinct, but tightly linked, so that thinking of one makes it easy to think of the other two.
  • Experienced readers can access meaning from print either by sounding words out or by matching the spelling on the page to an orthographic representation in the mind.
  • Experienced readers typically use both pathways to word meaning simultaneously as they read.
  • Orthographic representations of words help you identify letters, even as letter identification helps you know which word you’re reading; the two processes are reciprocal.
  • When readers can read by spelling as well as by sound, decoding requires less attention, which leaves more attention available for the work of comprehension.
  • Spelling representations develop through reading.

Implications

  • It seems at least plausible that you would use the same orthographic representations to read and to write. Thus we might expect that instruction in the spelling of words would help orthographic representations develop. Indeed, evidence shows that such instruction does improve reading. So that’s a reason to include spelling instruction in schools, even though we all use word processors with spell-checkers.
  • If orthographic representations develop through self-teaching, then they won’t develop as well if children don’t get proper feedback. That is, if a child sees “bear” but sounds it out as beer, that’s going to slow progress in developing the right orthographic representations, That, in turn, suggests that this aspect of reading practice will be more effective if students read aloud, rather than silently, at least until they can sound words out pretty reliably. The quality of feedback they receive matters too—gains are larger when an adult provides feedback than when a peer does.
  • If spelling representations help students read with greater prosody, then it might be helpful for students to have a model of what prosodic reading should sound like.

Discussion Questions

  • I said that the seemingly rule-less system of English spelling makes more sense if you take context into account. How many of these contextual rules do you think students are taught? Should they learn about them implicitly, as they gain experience in reading? Do you think most teachers explicitly know most of these rules?
  • How does the reciprocal nature of letter-reading and word-reading provide insight into why proofreading is so difficult?
  • People acquire all sorts of expertise that is primarily visual. For example, judges at dog shows have expertise in the desired looks of particular breeds and would notice subtle distinctions that most of us would miss. You can think of reading by orthography as a similar sort of visual expertise. How do you suppose someone like a dog show judge gains their expertise? Does this make you think about teaching reading differently or confirm what you already thought?
  • What are some of the ways that writers signal particular prosody? For example, in the sentence “Steve gave Pascual the ball,” how would you signal to a reader that the important message in this sentence is that it was Steve who did this, not someone else, as the reader might have thought? Although there are some ways to signal prosody, there’s nothing close to a complete system to do so. Why not? Why don’t we all learn a system of marks (as some languages use accent marks) that signal changes in emphasis, tempo, and pitch?
  • I’ve emphasized that adding orthographic representations results in smaller attention demand for decoding, leaving more attention available for comprehending what you’re reading. What else requires attention during reading? What types of texts are especially attention-demanding? What do readers choose to do as the read that draws attention away from the act of reading? How much does it matter?”

Excerpted from: Willingham, Daniel T. The Reading Mind: A Cognitive Approach to Understanding How the Mind Reads. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2017.

Term of Art: Sacred, Sacred versus Profane Distinction (in a Time of Gaslighting this Dichotomy)

“Sacred, Sacred versus Profane Distinction: For Emile Durkheim and all subsequent sociologists of religion, the recognition of the absolute nature of the distinction between these two terms was and has been fundamental to their subdiscipline, both as a social fact and as something to be explained. Durkheim’s classic statement or the distinction is that ‘Sacred things are those which the [religious] interdictions protect and isolate; profane things, those to which these interdictions are applied and which must remain at a distance from the first’ (The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life, 1912). Sacred phenomena are therefore considered extraordinary and set apart from everything else.”

Excerpted from: Marshall, Gordon, ed. Oxford Dictionary of Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.